Skip to main content

You are here

Advertisement

CRS: Multiemployer Pension Bill Would Hike Deficit by $64 Billion

Legislation

Legislation the House of Representatives passed on July 24 is intended to assist financially troubled multiemployer DB plans that meet specified criteria, but that help would come with a hefty price tag, according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS).

In a two-page report updated July 19, the CRS projects that the Rehabilitation for Multiemployer Pensions Act (H.R. 397) would increase the federal deficit by $64 billion over 10 years – echoing an estimate the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) prepared for the House Ways & Means Committee on July 8. The CRS had been more uncertain about similar legislation introduced in the previous Congress but not enacted, whose fiscal impact it said was “highly uncertain because of difficulty in projecting how the loan proposal would be implemented.”

Ways & Means Committee Chairman Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA), who had introduced similar legislation (also known as the “Butch Lewis Act”) during the 115th Congress, introduced H.R. 397 on Jan. 9. The Ways & Means Committee reported it to the House on July 18; one day later, the Education and Labor Committee followed suit and the Appropriations Committee discharged the bill. The House passed the bill late on July 24, the same day a similar bill was introduced in the Senate.

The bill would establish the Pension Rehabilitation Administration (PRA), a new agency within the Treasury Department. The PRA would issue bonds in order to finance loans to “critical and declining” status multiemployer pension plans, plans that have suspended benefits, and some recently insolvent plans currently receiving financial assistance from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).

All comments
John Feldt
4 years 9 months ago
If these plans are provided with loans (meaning they pay it all back), should the cost really be $64 billion? Or is this actually just a bailout paid by the taxpayer, meaning the loans are expected to go into default anyway, thus the $64 billion cost?